Every quarter, investment firms that manage more than $100 million file a form 13F with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). I find the 13F to be a valuable tool because it breaks down in detail which stocks institutional investors are buying and selling, and it can be interesting to try and identify patterns among Wall Street’s biggest money managers.
One investor that I enjoy following is Jeff Yass, the co-founder of Susquehanna International Group (SIG). During the second quarter, SIG purchased roughly 5 million shares of artificial intelligence (AI) stock Super Micro Computer (NASDAQ: SMCI) — increasing its position in the company (also known as Supermicro) by 148%.
Below, I’m going to break down the mechanics of Supermicro’s place in the AI realm and address some important topics that should be considered when investing in the company.
Supermicro often comes up when semiconductor companies such as Nvidia or Advanced Micro Devices are mentioned. For this reason, many investors perceive Supermicro as another chip stock — but in reality, this isn’t exactly right.
Supermicro is an IT infrastructure business that specializes in designing storage architecture for Nvidia’s and AMD’s graphics processing units (GPU). So, while demand in the chip industry has direct influences on Supermicro’s operation, the company itself is not a true semiconductor stock.
Although Supermicro has undoubtedly benefited from AI tailwinds, the financial profile below paints a pretty sobering reality.
Namely, Supermicro’s gross profit margin is trending in the wrong direction. Despite consistent acceleration across the top line, Supermicro’s unit economics are pretty backward.
While management has said that these headwinds will be short-lived, the reality is that IT infrastructure is not a high-margin industry. This dynamic leads me to my next important topic: competition and the risk of commoditization.
While Supermicro has done a respectable job of fostering relationships with some of the world’s leading GPU producers, these relationships are by no means exclusive.
Supermicro competes with plenty of other businesses that offer IT architecture solutions, including Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Lenovo, and Cisco. These companies are much larger and more diverse than Supermicro, making them formidable rivals.
Broadly speaking, when the same solution is offered by many players within the same industry, companies become forced to compete on price. So, even though Supermicro’s management has been forecasting increasing operating profit, I question how profitable the company will ever become as competition heats up.
I think the biggest topic investors need to be aware of when considering an investment in Supermicro is allegations made against the company by Hindenburg Research. Hindenburg is a short-seller, which means the firm has a financial interest in seeing a stock price decline.
Since Hindenburg published its short report on Aug. 27, shares of Supermicro had dropped by 16%.
To summarize, Hindenburg alleges that Supermicro’s financial controls and accounting practices may contain errors, perhaps intentionally. Considering Supermicro did wind up delaying its annual report, it’s clear why some investors sold the stock and moved on. Almost as concerning is a Wall Street Journal report that the U.S. Department of Justice is looking to Hindenburg’s claims.
With all of this said, nothing material has come from Hindenburg’s allegations yet, and it seems that the pronounced sell-off is rooted more in fear than anything concrete.
Supermicro currently trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of about 13.5. As the chart below indicates, Supermicro’s valuation multiples have deteriorated in recent months as speculation rises over the company’s future.
I can see how the allegations against the company may spur some panic selling. Meanwhile, the packed competitive landscape does make Supermicro’s long-run profitability picture hard to forecast. Nevertheless, I see Supermicro remaining as an important business in the world of IT infrastructure.
In the near term, I think Supermicro’s most obvious catalyst is the planned launch of Nvidia’s Blackwell GPU architecture. Furthermore, as businesses continue pouring billions of dollars into AI infrastructure, such as data centers, network connectivity solutions, and GPUs, I’m hard-pressed to buy into the narrative that Supermicro isn’t well positioned for the long run.
While I understand the risks surrounding Supermicro, I see the decline in the company’s valuation as a rare opportunity to scoop up shares of a growth stock at a more reasonable price.
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a “Double Down” stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
-
Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $21,154!*
-
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,777!*
-
Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $406,992!*
Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.
*Stock Advisor returns as of October 21, 2024
Adam Spatacco has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Cisco Systems, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Billionaire Jeff Yass Just Increased His Position In This Dirt Cheap Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock By 148%. Here Are 3 Things Smart Investors Should Know. was originally published by The Motley Fool
Source: finance.yahoo.com