The Pulitzer Prize administered by Columbia University was once a prestigious award handed out for meaningful achievements in the media and the arts. This year, a pornography-obsessed transvestite who recently advanced the thesis that womanhood is a matter of sexual penetration received the award for “distinguished criticism, using any available journalistic tool.”
What are the details?
Andrew Long Chu, who calls himself Andrea, will receive $15,000 along with the accolade for five book reviews in New York magazine wherein he allegedly employed “multiple cultural lenses to explore some of society’s most fraught topics.”
In one review, Chu discussed a short story about “a shut-in feudal lord who spends his days easing foreign objects into his rectum” and drew the conclusion that “this is why we all sh**: to be renewed. Everything else — money, political ideology, institutions of all kinds — is a distraction from the fundamental unity of sh** and spirit.”
Another book review found partially deserving of the Pulitzer concerned the missteps of a suicidal gay person.
Chu, who admitted in a 2013 article that he was a racist, navigated his hang-ups on the subject in a review entitled, “The Mixed Metaphor[:] Why does the half-Asian, half-white protagonist make us so anxious?”
Vox Media commended the Pulitzer Awards’ decision, claiming Chu “has made an indelible mark on readers and the industry as a whole” and further alleging that he “articulates fundamental truths” about the subject matter he scrutinizes.
It is unclear whether Vox Media and other leftist supporters reckon Chu’s recent remarks about women constitute articulations of fundamental truths.
Award-winning dehumanization
Reduxx reported that Chu’s first book, “Females,” published by Verso Press, served as a 94-page screed advancing the notion “that anyone can become female, and that being penetrated during sex defines womanhood.”
In the book, the transvestic author wrote, “Getting f***ed makes you female because f***ed is what a female is,” describing himself as once being “a sad, pretentious boy, furious about rape, hopelessly addicted to pornography.”
Chu also wrote that the “barest essentials” of femaleness are “an open mouth, an expectant ***hole, blank, blank eyes.”
The Pulitzer awardee has admitted that a porn obsession is what first prompted him to masquerade as a woman.
“Almost every night, for at least a year before I transitioned, I would wait till my girlfriend had fallen asleep and slip out of bed for the bathroom with my phone. I was going on Tumblr to look at something called sissy porn. I’d discovered it by accident one night, scrolling lazily down a pornographic rabbit hole,” he wrote.
The variety of porn in question concerns degenerate acts involving feminized men.
Chu admitted, “Sissy porn did make me trans. … At the center of sissy porn lies the ***hole, a kind of universal vagina through which femaleness can always be accessed.”
Elements of the literary world began to celebrate him after his so-called transition and apparent desperate need to speak about it at length.
According to Reduxx, after Andrew started calling himself Andrea, he was invited to speak at various universities, frequently speaking on the topic of his porn-exacerbated gender dysphoria.
He was also named as a finalist for the Lambda Literary Award in Transgender Nonfiction for his 2019 book dehumanizing women.
Chu’s dehumanization has not been limited to adult women.
He tweeted in 2019, “are there republican lawmakers less developed than a 6 week old fetus? yes. but do i think we should abort those lawmakers? also yes.”
On Jan. 28, 2019, he wrote, “thinking about getting a uterus transplant just to have an abortion.”
Backlash
A number of feminists have spoken out in response to the news that Chu won the Pulitzer.
Feminist novelist Christina Dalcher tweeted, “No, really, @PulitzerPrizes and anyone else celebrating this: F*** you. Sincerely, A Woman (the one and only kind).”
Kara Dansky, the president of the American chapter of Women’s Declaration International, referenced one of Chu’s more egregious anti-woman barbs and wrote, “Shame on you, @PulitzerPrizes.”
Award-winning New Yorker cartoonist Lisa Rothstein called the conference of the award upon Chu “revolting.”
Retired doctor and gender ideology critic Isidora Sanger said of Chu’s award, “Mediocrity of male supremacy waves its male genitals in women’s faces yet again.”
Jeremy Carl, a senior fellow at the Claremont Institution, wrote, “Thank you for demonstrating more powerfully than I ever could how the Pulitzer Prizes have become a complete joke.”
Here is Andrew Long Chu discussing “trans identity” back in December:
Andrea Long Chu | High Low with EmRatayoutu.be
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!