Share and speak up for justice, law & order…
CHICAGO – Two brothers who participated in a choreographed attack on Jussie Smollett as part of what the men now say was a fake hate crime hoax can move forward with a defamation claim against one of Smollett’s attorneys, a federal judge has ruled, Law&Crime reported.
Olabinjo Osundairo and Abimbola Osundairo, sued attorneys Mark Geragos, Tina Glandian, and the Geragos & Geragos Law Firm in 2019, according to court records,
“Mr. Smollett told Plaintiffs, in private, that he needed a favor from them: they were to help him stage a social media hoax and pretend to attack him,” the lawsuit says. “Mr. Smollett’s motivation was simple. He wanted his employer and the public to notice and appreciate him as a successful Black, openly gay actor. So, Mr. Smollett directed every aspect of the attack, including the location and the noose.”
Smollett was convicted of the hoax that drew international attention in December. He was subsequently sentenced to 150 days in jail earlier this month, Law Officer reported.
However, before spending a week in confinement, he was ordered released from custody while his case is heard on appeal.
The brothers make the following claim in their civil action charging defamation.
“Mr. Smollett’s attorneys, faced with an outraged public, did not retreat after their success. Instead they doubled down, not simply affirming that Mr. Smollett was a wholly innocent victim, but that (among other accusations) Plaintiffs [the brothers Osundairo] unequivocally led a criminally homophobic, racist, and violent attack against Mr. Smollett. Defendants made these comments knowing they were untrue to distract from Mr. Smollett’s farce and to promote themselves and the Geragos & Geragos Law Firm.”
Specifically, the brothers pointed to Glandian and Geragos appearances on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” on NBC’s “Today,” and on a podcast as evidence of alleged defamation.
“Ms. Glandian . . . falsely submitted that Plaintiffs may have been wearing ‘whiteface’ while attacking Mr. Smollett – again stating Plaintiffs battered Mr. Smollett and adding the implication that this battery was a hate crime,” the lawsuit alleged. “Ms. Glandian’s statements indicating Plaintiffs actually criminally battered Mr. Smollett without his consent are patently false and defamatory, as Mr. Smollett originated, planned, and orchestrated the attack.”
Most of the original 2019 lawsuit was previously thrown out. Hence, a more narrow amended complaint was filed June 11, 2020.
“Ms. Glandian falsely stated that Plaintiffs are involved in ‘illegal’ Nigerian steroid trafficking, and that these steroids help clients lose weight,” the amended complaint says. “Plaintiffs do not use or distribute illegal Nigerian steroids. Ms. Glandian’s comments are patently false and defamatory.”
Glandian filed subsequent paperwork to have the case dismissed, Law&Crime reported.
However, a judge issued an opinion and order on Thursday, March 17, 2022, in the District Court of Illinois, which allows the action to proceed forward.
The order verifies that Glandian is the remaining defendant after Garegos (individually) and his law firm (as a corporate agent) were long ago dismissed.
Share and speak up for justice, law & order…
Source: www.lawofficer.com